Implementing an EMR In A Rural Setting Feasibility There is no setting that an EMR would be most beneficial than a rural setting. Rural settings need the best technology to support physicians in their job performance. This is because rural settings have limited physicians and the few available are usually overworked. The costs for implementing the solution are negligible compared to the benefits that the health care facility will gain from an EMR. Considering that this will be done for a single provider, it is quite feasible. This is because the solution will be targeted towards the particular provider and they will get a solution that will handle their exact needs. Access to the medical records will be streamlined and cases of illegal access will be eliminated. Implementing an EMR at a rural setting has a higher chance of success as compared to the same in an urban area (Haggstrom et al., 2019). This could be based on the decision-making process of the rural setting. The amount of changes that would be required is reduced since the rural setting does not require too many modifications of the system. While implementing the system...

This means that the employees are not familiar or comfortable working with computers, which would make the adoption of the EMR an uphill task. Getting the buy-in from hospital staff might be another challenge. With employees who are used to doing things in a particular way, it becomes hard to make changes that they would accept (Jawhari, Ludwick, Keenan, Zakus, & Hayward, 2016). Without proper education on the benefits that the employees will gain from the new system, they will resist it and most of them would still continue to use the old manual ways. Rural hospitals cannot afford to make an error in the selection of the EMR solution. Since they have minimal technology budgets, rural hospitals have to ensure that the solution they select will be suitable for their practice. In case of any issues, the hospital might be unable to meet its daily requirements and activities…